Er… because it’s used with reference to the present time period? I don’t really have a good answer to this beyond ‘it feels like it’s used as a present tense’. I’ll try paying more attention next time.zompist wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2026 3:19 pmHow do you know it's present tense?
Innovative Usage Thread
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
I just came across and didn't blink at the following heading on Youtube "The Man Who Bankrupt Casinos Has Now Bankrupt the Navy". The creator used bankrupt rather than bankrupted as the past tense in his talk, so it's not just a typo.
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Of course, there are a good few irregular weak verbs in Standard English where the root ends with /t/ or /d/ where the past tense and past participle simply replace the stop with /t/ (and thus, if the verb already ended in /t/, the only way of telling the present and past indicative apart are that the 3sg. singular indicative takes -/s/) ─ this is certainly just an example of analogy with this pattern.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.