Pragmatics idea: overly generic answer as a substitute for "I don't know"

Conworlds and conlangs
Post Reply
Hyolobrika
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 2:59 pm
Location: le kibro gugde
Contact:

Pragmatics idea: overly generic answer as a substitute for "I don't know"

Post by Hyolobrika »

For example:
(Walking in woods or something)
A: ~"What did these feathers come from do you think?"
B: ~"Bird" ("I dunno")
A: ~"Yes" ("I don't know either")
This sounds awkward in English but in a conlang it obviously can sound however the creator wants it to.
'~' stands for sentences approximately close to the English.
My name is meant to be pronounced [çɔˈlɔːbrɪkʌ], but you can pronounce it any way you like.
The initial palatal fricative can be replaced by [hj] and the final vowel by [a] (I think that's the right IPA symbol).
---
Fiat verba, fiat grammatica, fiat lingua!
User avatar
Znex
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:59 pm

Re: Pragmatics idea: overly generic answer as a substitute for "I don't know"

Post by Znex »

You mean some phrase or word that can be used in any scenario in place of "I don't know"?

A number of Italian dialects have the very versatile expression "boh", which covers the range of "I don't know", "who knows? who cares?", "I won't say", "wait, what?", etc.
circeus
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: Pragmatics idea: overly generic answer as a substitute for "I don't know"

Post by circeus »

Znex wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 6:18 am You mean some phrase or word that can be used in any scenario in place of "I don't know"?

A number of Italian dialects have the very versatile expression "boh", which covers the range of "I don't know", "who knows? who cares?", "I won't say", "wait, what?", etc.
no, no, he means a language in which making a likely true answer, but too vague to be useful, is taken to mean "I don't know". In English, such answers are generally seen as cheeky or sarcastic because they violate the maxim of Quantity by being uninformative. In the purported language, violating the constraint in this way would be considered an admission of ignorance instead.
User avatar
jal
Posts: 870
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:13 pm

Re: Pragmatics idea: overly generic answer as a substitute for "I don't know"

Post by jal »

Circeus wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:20 pma language in which making a likely true answer, but too vague to be useful, is taken to mean "I don't know". In English, such answers are generally seen as cheeky or sarcastic because they violate the maxim of Quantity by being uninformative. In the purported language, violating the constraint in this way would be considered an admission of ignorance instead.
That's pretty cool, actually.


JAL
gestaltist
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 7:25 am

Re: Pragmatics idea: overly generic answer as a substitute for "I don't know"

Post by gestaltist »

It reminds me of what happens in some cultures anyway where admitting ignorance equals losing face so you'll get a likely answer instead of "I don't know".
User avatar
xxx
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:40 pm

Re: Pragmatics idea: overly generic answer as a substitute for "I don't know"

Post by xxx »

Hyolobrika wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 4:14 am For example:
(Walking in woods or something)
A: ~"What did these feathers come from do you think?"
B: ~"Bird" ("I dunno")
A: ~"Yes" ("I don't know either")
This sounds awkward in English but in a conlang it obviously can sound however the creator wants it to.
'~' stands for sentences approximately close to the English.
it can also be an apotropic answer, if you walk in a Jurassic forest, where birds are not the only ones to wear feathers...
it's mean I really do not want to know...

In my conlang that does not include speech acts, "I do not know" is only a silence that does not participate in the current speech...
Post Reply