Re: What have you accomplished today?
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:27 pm
I have added more to my beginnings of a grammar, including a good number of example sentences.
Crossing our fingers
https://www.verduria.org/
Wouldn’t it make better sense to have palatalized allophones before close vowels, instead of before front vowels ?Travis B. wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 11:42 pm I have collected what I have written about Rihalle Kaafi into the beginnings of a basic grammar.
I don't think so. Palatalization before front vowels is very much a thing; I don't know any language that palatalizes before close vowels. You may be thinking of the RUKI rule in Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian, which backs (not palatalizes; the outcomes in Indo-Aryan are retroflex, and in Slavic, velar) /s/ after close vowels, velar stops and /r/.TomHChappell wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:34 pmWouldn’t it make better sense to have palatalized allophones before close vowels, instead of before front vowels ?Travis B. wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 11:42 pm I have collected what I have written about Rihalle Kaafi into the beginnings of a basic grammar.
You're thinking of the realization of /t/ as [ts] before /ɯ/, which is distinct from the palatalization before /i/ and /iː/ or, historically, /e/ and /eː/* in Japanese.
Palatalization before front vowels as a class is very common crosslinguistically. It happened in Romance, Slavic, Anglo-Frisian, and Japanese (even though it has since been reversed before /e/ and /eː/) to give a few examples off the top of my head.TomHChappell wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:34 pmWouldn’t it make better sense to have palatalized allophones before close vowels, instead of before front vowels ?Travis B. wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 11:42 pm I have collected what I have written about Rihalle Kaafi into the beginnings of a basic grammar.
(Or, if you want palatalization to be perseverative rather than anticipatory, after close vowels.)
….
It might not matter what I think makes more sense.
I’m curious to know why you made your own, rather than using someone else’s? (For instance — mentioning it purely as a random example — mine?)Ryan of Tinellb wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2025 2:59 am I've (mostly) gotten an SCA working on my website, at Demotic Lulani Diachrony. Just gotta deal with pesky consonant clusters, and I'll be ready to unleash it on the actual vocabulary of the parent language.
Sometimes people just like writing software for its own sake. I created my own Forth, even though there are a zillion of Forths out there, including on each of the platforms I target (even though, to my knowledge, my Forth was the first to target the RP2350).bradrn wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2025 3:01 amI’m curious to know why you made your own, rather than using someone else’s? (For instance — mentioning it purely as a random example — mine?)Ryan of Tinellb wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2025 2:59 am I've (mostly) gotten an SCA working on my website, at Demotic Lulani Diachrony. Just gotta deal with pesky consonant clusters, and I'll be ready to unleash it on the actual vocabulary of the parent language.
Oh, what fun you’d be missing out on by not doing this!Ryan of Tinellb wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2025 2:55 pm I just hope I never get it into my head to make my own programming language, in English or in my conlang!
Code: Select all
Plain *t *s *k *kʷ *h
Weakened *r *r *ɣ *w *y,w,∅¹
Code: Select all
Plain *r *y *ɣ *w
Hardened *t *č *k *kʷ
Have you thought of adding allophonic nasal consonants, e.g. realizing /*r *y *ɣ *w/ as a nasal, say, before a nasal vowel?Skookum wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 4:10 pm Developed the beginnings of a phonology for a language I'm creatively calling "Proto-Plateau", ancestor of a relatively shallow language family (2-3000 years old) that will split into Proto-Highland and Proto-Lowland. The language was spoken by highly mobile hunter-gatherers, evidenced by the fact that there are no reconstructable lexemes for domesticated plants/animals other than "dog". Highland peoples still practice a nomadic way of life, while Lowland peoples are more sedentary, inhabiting productive river valleys with a focus on fishing and small-scale horticulture. Anyways, the phonology:
Consonants
/*t (*č¹) *k *kʷ *ʔ/
/*s *h/
/*r² *y *ɣ *w/
¹: Occurs only in morphophonogical alternation with *y, and in a handful of nominal/adjectival roots, all with diminutive or onomatopoeic associations (eg., *ča:ča: little sister, *čokʷčokʷ crow, raven, *tu:čẽh grey (cf. *tu:kẽh black)).
²: An alveolar approximant, as this is the pronunciation it has in most daughter languages where it hasn't shifted to /l/.
Vowels
/*i *i: *u *u:/
/*ẽ *ẽ: *ə *õ *õ:/
/*a *a:/
Syllable structure is CV(C). Roots are typically bisyllabic, and always end in a consonant.
Consonant mutation
Proto-Plateau was a highly suffixing language, and certain suffixes trigger mutation in the final consonant of a stem.
Certain (but not all) vowel initial suffixes trigger weakening of a stem-final consonant:¹: *h weakens to *y following a front vowel, *w following a rounded vowel, and deletes following *a *a: *ə.Code: Select all
Plain *t *s *k *kʷ *h Weakened *r *r *ɣ *w *y,w,∅¹
Certain (but not all) consonant-initial suffixes trigger hardening of a stem-final resonant.Working on stress at the moment.Code: Select all
Plain *r *y *ɣ *w Hardened *t *č *k *kʷ
Definitely, and these allophonic nasals will become phonemic in most (all?) daughter languages, similar to what some linguists have proposed for Siouan languages.Travis B. wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 5:15 pmHave you thought of adding allophonic nasal consonants, e.g. realizing /*r *y *ɣ *w/ as a nasal, say, before a nasal vowel?Skookum wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 4:10 pm Developed the beginnings of a phonology for a language I'm creatively calling "Proto-Plateau", ancestor of a relatively shallow language family (2-3000 years old) that will split into Proto-Highland and Proto-Lowland. The language was spoken by highly mobile hunter-gatherers, evidenced by the fact that there are no reconstructable lexemes for domesticated plants/animals other than "dog". Highland peoples still practice a nomadic way of life, while Lowland peoples are more sedentary, inhabiting productive river valleys with a focus on fishing and small-scale horticulture. Anyways, the phonology:
Consonants
/*t (*č¹) *k *kʷ *ʔ/
/*s *h/
/*r² *y *ɣ *w/
¹: Occurs only in morphophonogical alternation with *y, and in a handful of nominal/adjectival roots, all with diminutive or onomatopoeic associations (eg., *ča:ča: little sister, *čokʷčokʷ crow, raven, *tu:čẽh grey (cf. *tu:kẽh black)).
²: An alveolar approximant, as this is the pronunciation it has in most daughter languages where it hasn't shifted to /l/.
Vowels
/*i *i: *u *u:/
/*ẽ *ẽ: *ə *õ *õ:/
/*a *a:/
Syllable structure is CV(C). Roots are typically bisyllabic, and always end in a consonant.
Consonant mutation
Proto-Plateau was a highly suffixing language, and certain suffixes trigger mutation in the final consonant of a stem.
Certain (but not all) vowel initial suffixes trigger weakening of a stem-final consonant:¹: *h weakens to *y following a front vowel, *w following a rounded vowel, and deletes following *a *a: *ə.Code: Select all
Plain *t *s *k *kʷ *h Weakened *r *r *ɣ *w *y,w,∅¹
Certain (but not all) consonant-initial suffixes trigger hardening of a stem-final resonant.Working on stress at the moment.Code: Select all
Plain *r *y *ɣ *w Hardened *t *č *k *kʷ