Page 287 of 295
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 8:05 pm
by Raphael
zompist wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2026 8:01 pm
Raphael wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2026 6:51 pm
Perhaps, just speculating, something like "
The honored and sacred number one [or two]"?
It's a dead language, so it may well have been recorded very early, by someone not trained as a linguist. (That set was sent to me, so I don't have the original source.) So someone trying to elicit '2' maybe got something like 'the number 2' or 'second finger' or whatever.
But equally possible, it's something grammatically required in the language, for whatever reason. As an analogy, Dungan Chinese has
yigɨ lyongɨ sangɨ for 1/2/3. The
gɨ is not mysterious; it's a measure word that's got affixed to the numbers.
Thank you!
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 9:20 pm
by malloc
zompist wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2026 4:32 pm
People were talking about shortening number names in the Conlang Random Thread, so naturally I got to wondering what the longest natlang names for numbers are.
I'm just eyeballing this, but it's close enough:
1 (N Nambilkuara) – naĭúkənadaiş̌
2 (Kuwama) – parkatangkenʸ
3 (Bororo) – ure póbe ma jéw metúya bokwáre
4 (Chaap Wuurong) – pūlīt whummin bā pūlīt whummin
5 (Wathawurung) – bulatj-ba-bulatj-ba-kuimatj
6 (Hamtai) – feca hatuanga akapu hatuanga fati
7 (Moro) – ðέέnaŋ náŋáƚḿέñ́έ gáɽijan
8 (Enga) – mange-lao-waketau
9 (Bunabun) – ambentavdji’rukənem
10 (Mesem) – bainimbegere baje delang
Obviously those are all from different languages. Nonetheless, I must wonder how those languages count things with any degree of efficiency. Imagine trying to translate
Neunundneunzig Luftballons into Mesem.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 2:41 am
by hwhatting
zompist wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2026 8:01 pm
But equally possible, it's something grammatically required in the language, for whatever reason. As an analogy, Dungan Chinese has
yigɨ lyongɨ sangɨ for 1/2/3. The
gɨ is not mysterious; it's a measure word that's got affixed to the numbers.
Reminds me of Uzbek. You count
bir, ikki, uch, but if you mention the counted thing, especially if they are concrete items, you have to add
-ta:
bitta, ikkita, uchta. One could easily imagine that extension being carried over into counting as well. (IIRC,
ta as a counter is from Persian. The influence of Persian / Tajik on Uzbek is huge; I've even observed Persian numbers being used for counting, in card games (
yek, du, se).
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 2:57 am
by hwhatting
malloc wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2026 9:20 pm
Obviously those are all from different languages. Nonetheless, I must wonder how those languages count things with any degree of efficiency. Imagine trying to translate
Neunundneunzig Luftballons into Mesem.
I assume that when counting, they do it with gestures, using body counting systems (with fingers, toes, other body parts having conventional numbers associated to them) and only use the numbers to announce the results. And when the need arises to regularly use higher numbers, other number systems are loaned for that from the people you trade with (my daughter's boyfriend's birth language is Ilonggo, and he says that basically everyone is using Spanish numbers instead of the native Austronesian counting system).
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 8:26 am
by jal
Raphael wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2026 6:51 pm
Perhaps, just speculating, something like "
The honored and sacred number one [or two]"?
"The one and only", "Only this one and no other" etc.
JAL
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 8:38 am
by Travis B.
This reminds me of urban legends about how when Europeans first tried to ask indigenous people from some given part of the world what X was called they responded with Y which was not the term for X in their language and said Europeans did not realize this.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 10:25 am
by jal
Travis B. wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2026 8:38 amThis reminds me urban legends about how when Europeans first tried to ask indigenous people from some given part of the world what X was called they responded with Y which was
not the term for X in their language and said Europeans did not realize this.
"Kangaroo" comes to mind, which supposedly meant "I don't know" in some indigenous Australian language.
JAL
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 10:42 am
by Raphael
And then he told me
"Angikhulumi isingisi
Unaye umhumushi?
Yeka ukuklabalasa"
Well, I couldn't speak his language, I couldn't even understand a word
But I knew his meaning was what I decided I had heard
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2026 11:18 am
by Travis B.
jal wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2026 10:25 am
Travis B. wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2026 8:38 amThis reminds me urban legends about how when Europeans first tried to ask indigenous people from some given part of the world what X was called they responded with Y which was
not the term for X in their language and said Europeans did not realize this.
"Kangaroo" comes to mind, which supposedly meant "I don't know" in some indigenous Australian language.
When in fact
gangurru does mean a large gray or black kangaroo in the Guugu Yimidhirr language.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2026 9:23 am
by Qwynegold
Travis B. wrote: ↑Fri Aug 28, 2026 11:09 pm
Back when I studied Japanese in middle and high school, I specifically pronounced what is written in romaji as ⟨r⟩ as a lateral flap, but when I see it described in most contexts I see it being referred to just as a flap, without any mention of lateralness or at most mention that it is sometimes lateral. I know some people on this board are familiar with Japanese ─ do any of you pronounce this consistently as a lateral flap?
I do, but I don't know how consistently.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2026 10:38 pm
by Travis B.
I've spoken in length about my own English here, but do any of the other board members, or any of the family members of the other board members, speak in a highly diglossic fashion, or typically write in a language (excepting English) other than the language they typically speak? I know MacAnDàil is very familiar with Reunionese Creole, Scots, and Scottish Gaelic alongside French and English, and I know when Linguoboy was on here amongst other things he knew both Standard German and IIRC some Swabian variety.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:12 am
by hwhatting
Travis B. wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2026 10:38 pm
I know when Linguoboy was on here amongst other things he knew both Standard German and IIRC some Swabian variety.
Badensian. Don't call them Swabians down there, you'll get run out of town tarred and feathered.
By the way, does anyone know what's going on with Linguoboy and why he doesn't show up here anymore? I miss him.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:57 am
by KamareKitsune
Does anyone happen to know if any research has been done on the origins of interrogative words, and if so, where I might find anything written about it?
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 6:11 am
by jal
KamareKitsune wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:57 am
Does anyone happen to know if any research has been done on the origins of interrogative words, and if so, where I might find anything written about it?
Cross-linguistically?
JAL
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 6:34 am
by bradrn
KamareKitsune wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:57 am
Does anyone happen to know if any research has been done on the origins of interrogative words, and if so, where I might find anything written about it?
Well, one often-noted commonality is that interrogatives are often very similar to indefinites, or more generally demonstratives. For this I refer you to Bhat’s
Pronouns, which has quite a detailed discussion.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 7:31 am
by malloc
hwhatting wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:12 amBy the way, does anyone know what's going on with Linguoboy and why he doesn't show up here anymore? I miss him.
Indeed. He used to be a major poster and moderator so it seems odd that he apparently vanished without a trace. I just hope nothing happened to him.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 10:06 am
by KamareKitsune
jal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 6:11 am
KamareKitsune wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:57 am
Does anyone happen to know if any research has been done on the origins of interrogative words, and if so, where I might find anything written about it?
Cross-linguistically?
JAL
Yes.
bradrn wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 6:34 am
KamareKitsune wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:57 am
Does anyone happen to know if any research has been done on the origins of interrogative words, and if so, where I might find anything written about it?
Well, one often-noted commonality is that interrogatives are often very similar to indefinites, or more generally demonstratives. For this I refer you to Bhat’s
Pronouns, which has quite a detailed discussion.
Haspelmath makes a convincing case that the relationship between interrogatives and indefinites is
always that indefinites are derived from interrogatives, never the reverse.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 12:10 pm
by Richard W
Travis B. wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2026 10:38 pm
I've spoken in length about my own English here, but do any of the other board members, or any of the family members of the other board members, speak in a highly diglossic fashion, or typically write in a language (excepting English) other than the language they typically speak? I know MacAnDàil is very familiar with Reunionese Creole, Scots, and Scottish Gaelic alongside French and English, and I know when Linguoboy was on here amongst other things he knew both Standard German and IIRC some Swabian variety.
Probably my wife, but it's hard to be sure. Her native language is Northern Thai, and she usually speaks that with most blood relatives living in Thailand. She writes in Central Thai. While she
can distinguish /r/ and /l/ and utter them as the second element of clusters, she normally doesn't. She always uses /r/ for my name. I don't know how well she nowadays knows the letters and clusters that words are spelt with, but back when we were courting, she didn't, which could cause me trouble reading her letters. She's told me that she's sometimes caught herself speaking North Eastern Thai (Isan), which seems to be the native speech variety of most of the people she speaks Thai to face-to-face nowadays.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2026 3:58 pm
by zompist
Travis B. wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2026 10:38 pm
I've spoken in length about my own English here, but do any of the other board members, or any of the family members of the other board members, speak in a highly diglossic fashion, or typically write in a language (excepting English) other than the language they typically speak?
My wife, probably. She grew up in Iquitos, Peru, and the local variety is both phonologically distinct and suffused with Quechua. (Linguoboy in fact talked about her "crazy jungle Spanish".) But she also knows and uses standard Latin American Spanish— she has a degree in Spanish and has worked as an editor.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2026 8:57 pm
by Travis B.
hwhatting wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 2:12 am
By the way, does anyone know what's going on with Linguoboy and why he doesn't show up here anymore? I miss him.
I too wonder about this. I hope he's okay.