Zompist Bboard Again

Ah, yes, I remember that

What is that…?

EDIT: And yes, he has indeed been named PM.

The kid was picking his pockets so he slapped him. That was during his unsuccesful presidential campaign in 2002.
I thought it was ridiculous at best, but it didn't hurt his image or anything. People felt it was the responsible dad, tough on crime thing to do.

So, yeah, this is him. It looks like the RN will agree not to vote a mention of no confidence, which gives them leverage over him but apparently nobody cares. On the left, the PS might agree not to vote against him, but no more. The rest of the left will vote a motion of no confidence. All in all, it's very similar to Barnier's situation. (Bayrou and Barnier are additionally the same age, not that far apart politically, so well, nothing much changes!)

And now there are apparently reports that the Russians are building a lot more tanks than they need in Ukraine and putting them into storage, presumably for an attack on the EU. Sigh.

Raphael wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2024 9:12 am And now there are apparently reports that the Russians are building a lot more tanks than they need in Ukraine and putting them into storage, presumably for an attack on the EU. Sigh.

Do you have a source for that? A brief googling led to nothing much (except reports that Russia lost more tanks than expected in Ukraine.)

It's probably best not to pay attention too closely to Putin's sick mind games. Not that there isn't anything to worry about (of course there is) but his propaganda is definitely aimed at demoralizing European countries.

Mainly German-language sources, quoting the EU Defense Commissioner.

And Yoon was impeached. Finally. Now it is up to the Constitutional Court to dismiss him...

Have the Ukrainians gone completely crazy?

Raphael wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 2:40 am Have the Ukrainians gone completely crazy?

Are thinking of Kirillov's assassination? If so, that's an impressive move (if, yes, a bit crazy)

Yes.

Ares Land wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 2:56 am

Raphael wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 2:40 am Have the Ukrainians gone completely crazy?

Are thinking of Kirillov's assassination? If so, that's an impressive move (if, yes, a bit crazy)

I heard Bidenites arguing that Ukraine should ramp up the war with Russia so much that Trump wouldn't be able to stop it without Afghanistan levels of embarrassment.

For the record, there's now apparently a coalition agreement in Ireland - Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, and a number of independents.

Here in Germany, Friedrich Merz, chairman and chancellor-candidate of the center-right CDU, is currently playing a dangerous gamble, trying to blackmail the center-left parties into supporting stricter immigration laws (which would violate both the German constitution and EU law) by means of threatening to pass them with help from the far-right AfD. Which shows that his claim that he'll never form a coalition with the AfD probably isn't worth much. I sincerely hope that this gamble will result in a public scandal and cost his party many votes in the upcoming election.

EDIT: The CDU/CSU has now passed a resolution for immigration restrictions (fortunately, not binding; the government can and will ignore it) with the votes of the FDP and the AfD. The Brandmauer gegen rechts has fallen.

Good news from Austria: The coalition talks between the far-right FPÖ and the center-right ÖVP have failed. Now there's a chance of getting a centrist coalition, which surely would be better than far rightists at the helm.

WeepingElf wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 8:24 am Good news from Austria: The coalition talks between the far-right FPÖ and the center-right ÖVP have failed. Now there's a chance of getting a centrist coalition, which surely would be better than far rightists at the helm.

Excellent news.

Oh, and sorry to hear about Germany generally -- Merz is a dangerous man.

Ares Land wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 8:35 am

WeepingElf wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 8:24 am Good news from Austria: The coalition talks between the far-right FPÖ and the center-right ÖVP have failed. Now there's a chance of getting a centrist coalition, which surely would be better than far rightists at the helm.

Excellent news.

Oh, and sorry to hear about Germany generally -- Merz is a dangerous man.

Yes, Merz is a dangerous man whom I won't trust - but I hope the shitstorm he raised taught him (or at least his party) a lesson.

A wonderful quote from the local paper:

Jacqueline Maley wrote: It’s always heartening to know there is a Labor backbencher prepared to grumble anonymously to the press about others distracting attention from the government’s message, thereby distracting attention from the government’s message.

And yes, ’tis a sign that the election season is imminent…

Lost of interesting stuff in here, but just a factual clarification:

Take the Nazis for instance -- they did not seek to restore the German Empire that had been overthrown in the aftermath of WW1 or the power and status of the German aristocracy which had lost power in the creation of the Weimar republic (even though they used the term Deutsches Reich very liberally)

The Nazis used the name Deutsches Reich because that was the official name of the country, even after the Monarchy had been abolished and it had become a Republic*). After the annexation of Austria, the Nazis started calling it the Großdeutsches Reich, but I don't know how much that term was used officially (I have seen postage stamps using that name) or internationally.
While Germany was divided after the war, the offical position of West Germany (FRG) was that the Deutsches Reich continued to exist in the borders of 1937 (that is, after the legitimate return of the Saar area in 1935, but before the Nazis started to annex other countries or pieces thereof in 1938), pending a peace treaty. The official position today is that the resullts of the 4+2 negotiations in 1990 are the equivalant of the piece treaty, resulting in the demise of the Deutsches Reich as a state and establishing of the re-united FRG as its legal successor in 1990.
*) Another fun fact - the Nazis never formally abolished the Weimar constitution, they mostly ignored it, changing its stipulations, when they felt they had to, by simple laws or even by executive orders.

hwhatting wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 8:18 am *) Another fun fact - the Nazis never formally abolished the Weimar constitution, they mostly ignored it, changing its stipulations, when they felt they had to, by simple laws or even by executive orders.

That sounds ominously Trump- like.

Does a Papal election count as one in a “various countr[y]” for the purpose of this thread? On the one hand, I don't see what other thread would fit, but on the other, the countrihood of the Vatican City is delightfully ambiguous¹.

¹ And no, I don't have anything to add about it other than musings about what thread would be appropriate to talk about it in