Darren's Mitsiefa Thread

Conworlds and conlangs
bradrn
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Darren's Mitsiefa Thread

Post by bradrn »

Darren wrote: Sun May 26, 2024 1:48 am While it's a bizarre analysis, it's the biggest discrepancy between consonant phones and phonemes I've ever seen – on average more than 6 distinct realisations of each phoneme. And yes, obviously it's complete bunk.
Moloko (Chadic) has a single vowel phoneme with 5 realisations, plus another 5 realisations of an epenthetic vowel, thanks to word-level ‘prosodic’ features. Quite a lot of the Chadic languages are similar. So I wouldn’t be so confident as to call this one ‘obviously complete bunk’.

(That being said, the details of this analysis do look a great deal more strained than the Chadic ones. I don’t see the point of positing prosodies if they only ever apply to one CV syllable at a time!)
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Darren
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: Darren's Mitsiefa Thread

Post by Darren »

bradrn wrote: Sun May 26, 2024 4:11 am
Darren wrote: Sun May 26, 2024 1:48 am While it's a bizarre analysis, it's the biggest discrepancy between consonant phones and phonemes I've ever seen – on average more than 6 distinct realisations of each phoneme. And yes, obviously it's complete bunk.
Moloko (Chadic) has a single vowel phoneme with 5 realisations, plus another 5 realisations of an epenthetic vowel, thanks to word-level ‘prosodic’ features. Quite a lot of the Chadic languages are similar. So I wouldn’t be so confident as to call this one ‘obviously complete bunk’.

(That being said, the details of this analysis do look a great deal more strained than the Chadic ones. I don’t see the point of positing prosodies if they only ever apply to one CV syllable at a time!)
Yeah I draw the line at having not one but three different syllable-level nasalisations. His argument mostly rests on the fact that /e ɛ/ and /o ɔ/ are non-contrastive before prenasalised stops and after nasals, which apparently is a much bigger problem than the fact that half of his "prosodies" only occur with two (2) consonant onsets.
Darren
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: Darren's Mitsiefa Thread

Post by Darren »

How's this for obscure? A five-consonant inventory used in a (partly incorrect) transliteration of Persepolitan late Elamite texts by Edward Hincks in 1846:

Code: Select all

 p   t   k
     s
     n
Modern analysis suggests more like eleven consonants – still fairly small. I like Hincks's thinking though (he added the vowels /i u ə˞ a/ which is delicious).
Post Reply