The largest "village" in the State of Illinois has over 78,000 inhabitants. The smallest "city" has fewer than 200.
Innovative Usage Thread
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Spent Thanksgiving with a bunch of Colombians, so I learned that Columbians call white people monos (monkeys) instead of gringos.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:14 pm
- Rounin Ryuuji
- Posts: 2994
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
As a species, we're monkey-adjacent.
- linguistcat
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:17 pm
- Location: Utah, USA
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Cladistically, we are monkeys or monkey isn't a clade. That doesn't mean "monkey" couldn't have its own meaning in common usage, but I'd say all apes are tailless monkeys and that includes us.
A cat and a linguist.
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Humans are monkeys in the way that humans are reptiles. (I almost wrote "reptilians" - lol.)linguistcat wrote: ↑Fri Nov 25, 2022 11:54 amCladistically, we are monkeys or monkey isn't a clade. That doesn't mean "monkey" couldn't have its own meaning in common usage, but I'd say all apes are tailless monkeys and that includes us.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Not really — the most recent common ancestor of all reptiles is not an ancestor of humans (but it is an ancestor of birds), but the most recent common ancestor of all monkeys is an ancestor of humans.Travis B. wrote: ↑Fri Nov 25, 2022 12:04 pmHumans are monkeys in the way that humans are reptiles. (I almost wrote "reptilians" - lol.)linguistcat wrote: ↑Fri Nov 25, 2022 11:54 amCladistically, we are monkeys or monkey isn't a clade. That doesn't mean "monkey" couldn't have its own meaning in common usage, but I'd say all apes are tailless monkeys and that includes us.
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 3:11 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Non-mammal synapsids, like Dimetrodon, used to be regarded as reptiles (specifically "mammal-like reptiles"). I think that usage is deprecated now, but under it humans would be reptiles cladistically speaking.zyxw59 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 25, 2022 12:30 pmNot really — the most recent common ancestor of all reptiles is not an ancestor of humans (but it is an ancestor of birds), but the most recent common ancestor of all monkeys is an ancestor of humans.Travis B. wrote: ↑Fri Nov 25, 2022 12:04 pmHumans are monkeys in the way that humans are reptiles. (I almost wrote "reptilians" - lol.)linguistcat wrote: ↑Fri Nov 25, 2022 11:54 am
Cladistically, we are monkeys or monkey isn't a clade. That doesn't mean "monkey" couldn't have its own meaning in common usage, but I'd say all apes are tailless monkeys and that includes us.
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
However, Dimetrodon (c. 280 Mya) is more closely related to the earliest known Squamate (c. 110 Mya) than to modern mammals, for the amniotes seem to have splt c. 320 Mya.anteallach wrote: ↑Sat Nov 26, 2022 6:03 am Non-mammal synapsids, like Dimetrodon, used to be regarded as reptiles (specifically "mammal-like reptiles"). I think that usage is deprecated now, but under it humans would be reptiles cladistically speaking.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:14 pm
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
But how does that compare to Luca?
- WeepingElf
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
LUCA was way earlier, about 3,800 to 4,000 Mya.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
My conlang pages
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:14 pm
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Ah so then we are really closely related to those reptiles.
see it's all a question of knowing ones bearing.
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
I'm not sure if this is truly innovative or just a regional difference I was previously unaware of, but: "Because of this flexibility it was slightly unusual from other tower blocks of a similar vintage."
Speaking against this being a regionalism, the other examples I found online don't seem to be specific to any particular area:
"Slightly unusual from other essays."
"Unusual from other Delhi cafes."
{The Red Sox are not that unusual from other major league teams..."
Speaking against this being a regionalism, the other examples I found online don't seem to be specific to any particular area:
"Slightly unusual from other essays."
"Unusual from other Delhi cafes."
{The Red Sox are not that unusual from other major league teams..."
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:19 pm
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
What would you usually say by the way? In my L2 idiolect I think I say "unusual compared to", but maybe there's another way.Linguoboy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 22, 2022 8:53 pm I'm not sure if this is truly innovative or just a regional difference I was previously unaware of, but: "Because of this flexibility it was slightly unusual from other tower blocks of a similar vintage."
Speaking against this being a regionalism, the other examples I found online don't seem to be specific to any particular area:
"Slightly unusual from other essays."
"Unusual from other Delhi cafes."
{The Red Sox are not that unusual from other major league teams..."
- quinterbeck
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 12:19 pm
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
That's acceptable, as would be "unusual compared with". I would probably rephrase "?unusual from other Xs" as "unusual for a/an X", or "unusual among Xs", although they have less contrastive force.Kuchigakatai wrote: ↑Fri Dec 23, 2022 12:18 am What would you usually say by the way? In my L2 idiolect I think I say "unusual compared to", but maybe there's another way.
Slightly unusual for an essay
Unusual among Delhi cafes
For some sentences, using only the article works. I think here it's the comparative construction that makes it possible:
The Red Sox are not that unusual a major league team
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
I am with Kuchigakatai and quinterbeck here.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 2:12 am
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
Recently read a book by Lisa Tomlinson that said (roughly) "In the 1920s Black music was very underground, very benign." It took me a while to understand what they were trying to say, until I realized they have extrapolated "benign" form its oncological use to mean "unobtrusive or under control, not likely to assert itself" in other contexts. In this way, what was originally a positive connotation ("benign growths") has become a negative one ("benign/suppressed musical traditions"). I think Tomlinson is Caribbean, and I wonder if maybe this extension is normal in Caribbean English.
I did it. I made the world's worst book review blog.
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
While writing my book i struck upon "Continued Life" as meaning life which had continued as before major change to it. It felt better than "Continued Existence" at least.
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:19 pm
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
https://i.redd.it/ytbkqo0ht8j81.jpg
There is definitely something to be said about the use of -cel, -pilled, going [noun] mode, and -core. And the suffix -maxx.
There is definitely something to be said about the use of -cel, -pilled, going [noun] mode, and -core. And the suffix -maxx.
Re: Innovative Usage Thread
An interesting malapropism in a YouTube video description -
"I do not own this song, nor the image. I am fully complacent with any requests made to remove this video..."
"I do not own this song, nor the image. I am fully complacent with any requests made to remove this video..."
[ð̞͡ˠʟ] best sound