Random Thread

Topics that can go away
User avatar
Linguoboy
Posts: 2359
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:00 am
Location: Rogers Park

Re: Random Thread

Post by Linguoboy »

Qwynegold wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 12:06 pmI have a question for the Americans here. I bought this sarsaparilla drink. I was thinking "now I finally get to know what sarsaparilla tastes like". When I opened the bottle I was taken aback by the smell of dentist clinic. And it tasted like flouride wash. Or a little bit like chewing gum. Is this what sarsaparilla is supposed to taste like? What abour rootbeer?
Now I'm kind of intrigued to taste your fluoride wash.
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4067
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: Random Thread

Post by Raphael »

I've noticed that I more and more dislike the phrase "the rich and famous". Why? Because it, at least implicitly, sends the message that these two groups are the same. And they aren't. At least not really.

Yes, there's a lot of overlap between the two groups. The richest people in the world are generally famous, too, and the most famous people in the world are generally rich, too, and there's a whole group of people - the celebrities - who are both rich and famous. But, that said, most rich people aren't famous, and a lot of fairly well-known people seem to have middle-class incomes. All too many people seem to assume that everyone they've ever seen on TV or a streaming service is rich, which is nonsense. Most people in movies aren't stars.

Also, the phrase "the rich and famous" focuses people's attention on celebrities, as if they'd be the group of rich people we should worry most about, when in fact, that's the business class. Celebrities do some harm with their promotion of medical quackery, and some more through the simple fact that they have so much money, but mostly, they're just embarrassments. The business class is a lot worse than that.
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Random Thread

Post by Man in Space »

Today, I saw the best billboard I've ever come across. Some context is, however, required.

Traffic cameras are almost totally prohibited in the Ohio state constitution. The sole exception to this is if there's an officer physically present with the camera to verify and issue the citation. For most localities, this is sufficient to deter them from using traffic cameras because money.

Linndale, however, is not among them. A small community that's about three blocks wide, they apparently found it in the budget to station an officer by their traffic camera. There's an infamous stretch of road where the speed limit suddenly cuts by ten miles an hour for all three blocks, and that's where the camera is. For obvious reasons this is widely viewed as an underhanded cash grab. I've never had occasion to pass by there (so far as I know) but I know a couple people who've been stung by this stealth speed trap.

The next community over from Linndale is Brooklyn, and there happens to be a billboard stationed on the Brooklyn side of the border just down the street from where the camera is. So, this. I love everything about it. The dystopian cyberpunk undercurrent. The fact that they're giving a heads-up to motorists who might otherwise be clueless. The middle finger to the Linndale PD. The sponsor plug. I've been cracking up about this for the past six hours and I just had to share.
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4067
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: Random Thread

Post by Raphael »

New short blog post, where I kind of ask a question and then kind of answer it myself:

https://guessishouldputthisupsomewhere. ... -or-whine/
User avatar
alynnidalar
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:51 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Random Thread

Post by alynnidalar »

Man in Space wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:05 pm Today, I saw the best billboard I've ever come across.
Oh that is just stupendous. I love it.
MacAnDàil
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:10 pm

Re: Random Thread

Post by MacAnDàil »

Man in Space wrote: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:05 pm Today, I saw the best billboard I've ever come across. Some context is, however, required.

Traffic cameras are almost totally prohibited in the Ohio state constitution. The sole exception to this is if there's an officer physically present with the camera to verify and issue the citation. For most localities, this is sufficient to deter them from using traffic cameras because money.

Linndale, however, is not among them. A small community that's about three blocks wide, they apparently found it in the budget to station an officer by their traffic camera. There's an infamous stretch of road where the speed limit suddenly cuts by ten miles an hour for all three blocks, and that's where the camera is. For obvious reasons this is widely viewed as an underhanded cash grab. I've never had occasion to pass by there (so far as I know) but I know a couple people who've been stung by this stealth speed trap.

The next community over from Linndale is Brooklyn, and there happens to be a billboard stationed on the Brooklyn side of the border just down the street from where the camera is. So, this. I love everything about it. The dystopian cyberpunk undercurrent. The fact that they're giving a heads-up to motorists who might otherwise be clueless. The middle finger to the Linndale PD. The sponsor plug. I've been cracking up about this for the past six hours and I just had to share.
Billboards are awful things as a rule.
Banning traffic cameras does not seem a good idea to me considering they contribute to significantly reducing traffic deaths. Vaping contributes to creating deaths.
But I suppose Linndale should be signposting it themselves.
Travis B.
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: Random Thread

Post by Travis B. »

Traffic cameras contribute to law enforcement designed as a source of revenue over actually contributing to safety, e.g. deliberately (often illegally) shortening yellow light intervals where there are red light cameras and speed traps such as this one. The only way I would not disagree vehemently with traffic cameras would be if, say, the state or federal gov't confiscated all fines from them and donated them to charity to prevent them from becoming a source of revenue for local police dep'ts and local gov'ts and thus reduce the motivation for them to engage in such activities.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka ha wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinutha gaare d'ate ha eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Qwynegold
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:03 pm
Location: Stockholm

Re: Random Thread

Post by Qwynegold »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 12:11 pmI've never had sarsparilla, but root beer doesn't taste anything like the flavors of mint that mouthwash typically come in to me.
Linguoboy wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 4:11 pmNow I'm kind of intrigued to taste your fluoride wash.
Well, it's not mint flavored, because I use a mild one. And it's only for fluoride, not for killing bacteria. The smell is exactly like that at dentist clinics. The taste is like my fluoride, but also a bit like candy with bubble gum flavor.
MacAnDàil
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:10 pm

Re: Random Thread

Post by MacAnDàil »

Travis B. wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:33 am Traffic cameras contribute to law enforcement designed as a source of revenue over actually contributing to safety, e.g. deliberately (often illegally) shortening yellow light intervals where there are red light cameras and speed traps such as this one. The only way I would not disagree vehemently with traffic cameras would be if, say, the state or federal gov't confiscated all fines from them and donated them to charity to prevent them from becoming a source of revenue for local police dep'ts and local gov'ts and thus reduce the motivation for them to engage in such activities.
Maybe traffic cameras are used differently in America from anywhere I've been.
Ares Land
Posts: 2733
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:35 pm

Re: Random Thread

Post by Ares Land »

MacAnDàil wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:37 am Billboards are awful things as a rule.
Banning traffic cameras does not seem a good idea to me considering they contribute to significantly reducing traffic deaths. Vaping contributes to creating deaths.
But I suppose Linndale should be signposting it themselves.
Vaping is probably improving public health overall! But the billboard is funny precisely because it's so completely fucked up :)
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4067
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: Random Thread

Post by Raphael »

Very recently, I came across a variant of The Acronym Formerly Known As LGBT that included the letter "U" somewhere in it. I could tell what each of the other letters in that particular variant of the acronym stood for, but I drew a blank at "U". If it helps, the variant of the acronym appeared in a German text, but as far as I could tell, all the other letters stood for English words, so I assume the "U" did, too.
Travis B.
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: Random Thread

Post by Travis B. »

Raphael wrote: Tue Sep 20, 2022 5:26 pm Very recently, I came across a variant of The Acronym Formerly Known As LGBT that included the letter "U" somewhere in it. I could tell what each of the other letters in that particular variant of the acronym stood for, but I drew a blank at "U". If it helps, the variant of the acronym appeared in a German text, but as far as I could tell, all the other letters stood for English words, so I assume the "U" did, too.
To be honest, I tend to prefer to just say LGBT and leave it at that. If people really insist otherwise I might tack a Q on the end. I've never seen U included in that alphabet soup though.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka ha wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinutha gaare d'ate ha eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
User avatar
Rounin Ryuuji
Posts: 2951
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: Random Thread

Post by Rounin Ryuuji »

I never heard of a "U" in it either.
User avatar
linguistcat
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:17 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Re: Random Thread

Post by linguistcat »

The only version that I know with a U in it is also mostly joking: QUILTBAG. And I think if anything the U was attached to the Q for QUeer. I have no idea why that one would be used in German either.
A cat and a linguist.
Arkasas
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:26 am
Location: Look behind you

Re: Random Thread

Post by Arkasas »

I think the U is meant to stand for unidentifying or something like that.
there's not an n
sangi39
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 1:16 am

Re: Random Thread

Post by sangi39 »

Quickly searching for it in on Google, seems to stand for "unsure", seperating out the two version of "Q", "queer" and "questioning" into "QU" for "queer" and "unsure"
User avatar
Linguoboy
Posts: 2359
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:00 am
Location: Rogers Park

Re: Random Thread

Post by Linguoboy »

sangi39 wrote: Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:36 am Quickly searching for it in on Google, seems to stand for "unsure", seperating out the two version of "Q", "queer" and "questioning" into "QU" for "queer" and "unsure"
What I've seen most often is "Undecided" but the underlying idea is the same: to include folks who are interrogating their sexuality and don't have any hard answers yet in terms of what their identity is but are fairly sure they're not ordinary cishets.

The nice thing about the QUILTBAG acronym is that several of the letters can be multivalent. "G", for instance, can stand for "Genderqueer" or "Genderfluid" as well as "Gay". (There are some folks who say that "A" can also stand for "Ally", but I'm not down with that. I welcome allies, but they are different on a very fundamental level. If push comes to shove, they can always wash their hands of us, as they have so very many times before.)
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4067
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: Random Thread

Post by Raphael »

Ok, thank you, everybody, I guess that's a wrap - it's probably "unsure" or "undecided".
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4067
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: Random Thread

Post by Raphael »

My main ebook online store has an advertising campaign celebrating "75 years of Stephen King". They mean, of course, the fact that he had his 75th birthday yesterday. But when I first saw the slogan, I thought that they meant it was about 75 years of him publishing books. And I was like, "What? He's that old already?"
User avatar
Rounin Ryuuji
Posts: 2951
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: Random Thread

Post by Rounin Ryuuji »

I didn't realise he was already 75.
Post Reply