Search found 877 matches

by jal
Tue May 07, 2024 2:19 pm
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

I must emphasize that if there is to be any temporal references, it is between future and non-future, not past and non-past. Sure, but your counterfactual seems decidedly +past. The realis can be marked in the apodosis, for matters involving implication (there are hoofprints here, so there must be ...
by jal
Tue May 07, 2024 12:10 pm
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

The irrealis is typically future-orientated while the counterfactual is nonfuture -orientated. So the distinction in the protasis makes sense. Yet, they (at least the irrealis) don't have to refer to time at all. Or, rather, the irrealis is far less tied to temporality than the counterfactual. So i...
by jal
Tue May 07, 2024 10:59 am
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

Well yes, but I could just as much mark it in the irrealis mood since the irrealis deals with unrealized or nonactual events. So what for you is the difference between "counterfactual" and "unrealized/nonactual"? Seems to me that semantically these are very close, if not the sam...
by jal
Tue May 07, 2024 5:42 am
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

So that is why I don't know whether the condition clause is supposed to be marked counterfactual or if it's the consequence clause, or both. I don't know the psycholinguostics or formal logic or semantic theories or whatever is involved. "Condition clause" and "consequence clause&quo...
by jal
Fri May 03, 2024 8:28 am
Forum: Languages
Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Replies: 4682
Views: 2058814

Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread

hwhatting wrote: Fri May 03, 2024 5:17 amRe Low German
Thanks for the addition/correction!


JAL
by jal
Fri May 03, 2024 3:12 am
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

bradrn wrote: Thu May 02, 2024 10:08 amI did mention Kupwar already, but that’s in Asia. (Apparently the name for this is ‘metatypy’.)
Ah, yes, I think it is Kupwar that I was thinking about, thanks!


JAL
by jal
Fri May 03, 2024 3:11 am
Forum: Languages
Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Replies: 4682
Views: 2058814

Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread

I am kind of proud of speaking dialect everywhere I can, to be honest. (It is your own fault for not understanding Milwaukee dialect I'm all for it :mrgreen: I feel like it is unfortunate that many people elsewhere think that they must speak a standard variety, which is why we have things like trad...
by jal
Thu May 02, 2024 9:23 am
Forum: Languages
Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Replies: 4682
Views: 2058814

Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread

keenir wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 9:35 pmI fear that, next time, you may have to ask the barista to repeat your order back to you.
Or be less stubborn and just use GenAm when ordering :mrgreen:


JAL
by jal
Thu May 02, 2024 9:22 am
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

but grammars tend to converge anyway, because this is less obvious to the speakers themselves. Iirc there's an African(?) city where two languages are spoken that have almost no shared vocabulary, but almost identical grammar. Can't recall which city, unfortunately, and a quick google doesn't show ...
by jal
Wed May 01, 2024 5:11 pm
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

No, because that's not how language contact works. Vocabulary is in most situations the easiest thing to change. I'm going to disagree by proxy. I've read that there's two situations in which languages might influence each other. The first is contact where speakers of language A have contact with s...
by jal
Tue Apr 30, 2024 10:40 am
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang fluency thread
Replies: 2430
Views: 1480690

Re: Conlang fluency thread

Wow! Did you already translate six chapters? That's a lot of work! Me mek, an ye, olip wohk fo so :D I did, and yes, quite some work :D. (And I need to revisit the older chapters, as I started about five years ago, and the grammar has been changed an augmented, though most will still be ok. But tha...
by jal
Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:23 pm
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang fluency thread
Replies: 2430
Views: 1480690

Re: Conlang fluency thread

Mi finis don cata 6 a Obit Ya, "Ota Skilat ina Faya". Yu me luk im de ya.
I finished chapter 6 of the Hobbit, "Out of the Frying Pan into the Fire". You can see it here.


JAL
by jal
Sun Apr 21, 2024 12:57 pm
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

I can't think of thousands of years of sound changes. I also have to start from somewhere, so some things are lost to the vagaries of time. Also, thousands of years are enough to change about any sound into another. Given levelling of irragularities over time, I think you can get away fine with a r...
by jal
Sat Apr 20, 2024 11:11 am
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

bradrn wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 4:09 amI know nothing of Doctor Who, but that last name reminds me of Greek ouroboros more than anything Latinate.
Seconded.


JAL
by jal
Sun Apr 14, 2024 1:45 pm
Forum: Languages
Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Replies: 4682
Views: 2058814

Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread

How did the Chancery Standard (the basis for modern Standard English) come into being? Was it based on some specific dialect, spoken in a specific region? According to Wikipedia: The Chancery Standard of written English emerged c. 1430 in official documents that, since the Norman Conquest, had norm...
by jal
Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:21 am
Forum: Languages
Topic: The "How Do You Pronounce X" Thread
Replies: 1782
Views: 4935275

Re: The "How Do You Pronounce X" Thread

foxcatdog wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:22 pmI have a rhotic pronounciation of "Vehicles"
Veericles?


JAL
by jal
Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:59 am
Forum: Languages
Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Replies: 4682
Views: 2058814

Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread

The pattern of traditional Central German dialects is to have fricatives instead of voiceless stops for StG /b g/ in many cases (which is reflected in StG by the standard pronunciation of - ig and in informal writing by things like writing Tag as Tach ). I must've confused them with Upper Saxon. As...
by jal
Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:32 am
Forum: Languages
Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Replies: 4682
Views: 2058814

Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread

Travis B. wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 10:04 amActually, this is the system in many Upper German varieties -- it just happens that traditionally the voiceless stops are written with <b d g>.
I thought this was a feature of the central German dialects, not the South ones?


JAL
by jal
Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:31 am
Forum: Languages
Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Replies: 4682
Views: 2058814

Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread

So what may have happened is this: When Germanic peoples had conquered what is now southern Germany, Austria and Switzerland, the Vulgar Latin speakers, in adopting the language of their new overlords, identified the Germanic voiced stops not with their own voiced stops but with their voiceless one...
by jal
Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:04 pm
Forum: Conlangery
Topic: Conlang Random Thread
Replies: 2957
Views: 2847615

Re: Conlang Random Thread

Had some more fun with ChatGPT yesterday. Wrote a concise conlang grammar and some vocab, then asked ChatGPT to translate English sentences. It's amazing what it can do, but also where it fails. For example, if you do not explicitly state what a vowel is, it assumes no letters are vowels, apparently...