Šɯk grammar

Almea and the Incatena
User avatar
Ketsuban
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 6:10 pm

A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by Ketsuban »

I know Sumerian has trouble keeping track of affixes when chaining possessives together: everything is fine at first (ensi Lagash-ak "the ruler of Lagash", dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son") but when you add a third link the affix tends to get forgotten: dam dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son's wife". Does Šɯk experience anything similar, or would it be incorrect to fail to stack -at three times in *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-at "the queen's healer's son's house"? What about if there's an intervening plural marker, such as *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-nye-at "the queen's healer's sons' house"? The same question I suppose applies to the other clitics; would one-man-and-his-dog-esque "A and B and C and …" constructions get weird if you have to string together lots of -bæ?
vegfarandi
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:52 am

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by vegfarandi »

Ketsuban wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:48 am I know Sumerian has trouble keeping track of affixes when chaining possessives together: everything is fine at first (ensi Lagash-ak "the ruler of Lagash", dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son") but when you add a third link the affix tends to get forgotten: dam dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son's wife". Does Šɯk experience anything similar, or would it be incorrect to fail to stack -at three times in *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-at "the queen's healer's son's house"? What about if there's an intervening plural marker, such as *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-nye-at "the queen's healer's sons' house"? The same question I suppose applies to the other clitics; would one-man-and-his-dog-esque "A and B and C and …" constructions get weird if you have to string together lots of -bæ?
I don't know what zompist will answer but my guess is that the breakdown of purely correct grammar in such complex constructions is pretty natural and very likely to also occur in Šɯk. In most cases, when such things happen, the inaccuracy of the uttered (or written) grammar doesn't reflect a different system at work but more like a certain level of "slack" in the system. If you technically need three genitive markers in a row but only use two, it's unlikely that the lack of one marker is what gets you misunderstood in the broader context of the conversation.
Duriac Threadhe/him
bradrn
Posts: 6194
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by bradrn »

Incidentally, thanks for alerting me to the fact that Šɯk has been published! At a quick skim it reminds me fairly strongly of Khoekhoe, though the clicks are interestingly un-Earthlike — I’d quite like to know more about their phonetic realisation.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
vegfarandi
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:52 am

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by vegfarandi »

bradrn wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:06 am Incidentally, thanks for alerting me to the fact that Šɯk has been published! At a quick skim it reminds me fairly strongly of Khoekhoe, though the clicks are interestingly un-Earthlike — I’d quite like to know more about their phonetic realisation.
I like to take any opportunity I see to plug Zompist's Patreon where you can learn about the modern (and future) world of Almea and see pre-release versions of grammars. It's been really fantastic and I'm personally very give a little bit back to Mark after so many years on his forum for free :) :)
Duriac Threadhe/him
bradrn
Posts: 6194
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by bradrn »

vegfarandi wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:18 am
bradrn wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:06 am Incidentally, thanks for alerting me to the fact that Šɯk has been published! At a quick skim it reminds me fairly strongly of Khoekhoe, though the clicks are interestingly un-Earthlike — I’d quite like to know more about their phonetic realisation.
I like to take any opportunity I see to plug Zompist's Patreon where you can learn about the modern (and future) world of Almea and see pre-release versions of grammars. It's been really fantastic and I'm personally very give a little bit back to Mark after so many years on his forum for free :) :)
Oh, I know about that already, but for various reasons it’s a bit tricky for me to subscribe to it at the moment, which is why I have to rely on what little is available publicly.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2912
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by zompist »

Had to look up Jagersma on this... you and veg are right, Sumerian only stacks two ak in a row.

(Also, when I learned about this insane construction I just had to use it. There are more Sumerian borrowings in Šɯk as well, especially in the verbal section.)
Ketsuban wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:48 am I know Sumerian has trouble keeping track of affixes when chaining possessives together: everything is fine at first (ensi Lagash-ak "the ruler of Lagash", dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son") but when you add a third link the affix tends to get forgotten: dam dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son's wife". Does Šɯk experience anything similar, or would it be incorrect to fail to stack -at three times in *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-at "the queen's healer's son's house"?
You can't stack more than two at directly; this would be just nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at.
What about if there's an intervening plural marker, such as *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-nye-at "the queen's healer's sons' house"?
This however is fine.

I think this counts as a center embedding, so I would try not to push it further than that. :) This probably sounds to a Šɯk speaker like those grammatical-but-marginally-comprehensible English examples ("He said that that "that" that that "that" referred to was something else entirely").
The same question I suppose applies to the other clitics; would one-man-and-his-dog-esque "A and B and C and …" constructions get weird if you have to string together lots of -bæ?
I'm going to say that -bæ can't be stacked at all, but doesn't need to be: you can say A B C-bæ.

(It's grammatically correct to say [A B-bæ] C-bæ. You could use that if it made semantic sense, kind of like "Batman and Superman, and also Joker.")

I've updated the grammar accordingly.
User avatar
WarpedWartWars
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 2:31 pm
Location: tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by WarpedWartWars »

zompist wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:31 pm "He said that that "that" that that "that" referred to was something else entirely"
I was struggling to find a grammatical sentence with three "that"s in a row, and you just gave one with six of them!
tɑ tɑ tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts olɑrk siθe
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death

tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2912
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by zompist »

WarpedWartWars wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 3:01 am
zompist wrote: Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:31 pm "He said that that "that" that that "that" referred to was something else entirely"
I was struggling to find a grammatical sentence with three "that"s in a row, and you just gave one with six of them!
Heh! It's not mine-- I ran into (a version of) it long ago.
User avatar
foxcatdog
Posts: 1658
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:49 pm

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by foxcatdog »

In the sections on topicalisation the gloss is off. with the that.one occuring after the warrior instead of before it. I thought it was a bit off until i reread it and realised the language gloss was correct.
User avatar
WeepingElf
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by WeepingElf »

What are those funny letters like ʇ or ʘ? Clicks?
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2912
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by zompist »

thethief3 wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:08 am In the sections on topicalisation the gloss is off. with the that.one occuring after the warrior instead of before it. I thought it was a bit off until i reread it and realised the language gloss was correct.
Fixed, thanks! (You may have to reload the page.)
User avatar
WarpedWartWars
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 2:31 pm
Location: tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by WarpedWartWars »

WeepingElf wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:22 am What are those funny letters like ʇ or ʘ? Clicks?
Exactly--ʘ is labial, ʇ is dental.
Last edited by WarpedWartWars on Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tɑ tɑ tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts olɑrk siθe
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death

tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2912
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by zompist »

WarpedWartWars wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:35 pm
WeepingElf wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:22 am What are those funny letters like ʇ or ʘ? Clicks?
Exactly--ʘ is bilabial, ʇ is dental (I think).
There is a phonology section in the grammar... :P
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2912
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Šɯk grammar

Post by zompist »

Well, I can't seem to put this post at the top. But here's a link:

Grammar of Šɯk
User avatar
WarpedWartWars
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 2:31 pm
Location: tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by WarpedWartWars »

zompist wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:04 pm
WarpedWartWars wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:35 pm
WeepingElf wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:22 am What are those funny letters like ʇ or ʘ? Clicks?
Exactly--ʘ is bilabial, ʇ is dental (I think).
There is a phonology section in the grammar... :P
I know, I was just going off my memory from reading it yesterday or maybe the day before.
tɑ tɑ tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts olɑrk siθe
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death

tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Šɯk grammar

Post by Man in Space »

I just want to say that I think Šɯk is really cool. I'm an especial fan of the clicks—I like seeing them in conlangs.
User avatar
WeepingElf
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar

Post by WeepingElf »

zompist wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:04 pm
WarpedWartWars wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:35 pm
WeepingElf wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:22 am What are those funny letters like ʇ or ʘ? Clicks?
Exactly--ʘ is bilabial, ʇ is dental (I think).
There is a phonology section in the grammar... :P
Sorry, then, for the dumb question ;)
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Šɯk grammar

Post by Man in Space »

I believe there’s a word missing from the sample here:
ɤʇlil, pægain ǁɤ nyany ifa men ʘily.
end-loc unite-3 Nyaʇa valley all-pl and be-3 queen
Finally Nyaʇa brought all the valleys together and became queen.
bradrn
Posts: 6194
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Šɯk grammar

Post by bradrn »

Man in Space wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 1:21 pm I believe there’s a word missing from the sample here:
ɤʇlil, pægain ǁɤ nyany ifa men ʘily.
end-loc unite-3 Nyaʇa valley all-pl and be-3 queen
Finally Nyaʇa brought all the valleys together and became queen.
If there is, I can’t find it.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
User avatar
alice
Posts: 954
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:15 am
Location: 'twixt Survival and Guilt

Re: Šɯk grammar

Post by alice »

The name "ʇeʇ" on the map made me wonder if the page was rotated 180 degrees somehow. Then I wondered if it was "ʇəʇ" and Zomp was experimenting with an orthography which meant something completely different upside-down. Of course none of this is true, but it might start giving people ideas.
Self-referential signatures are for people too boring to come up with more interesting alternatives.
Post Reply