Šɯk grammar
A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
I know Sumerian has trouble keeping track of affixes when chaining possessives together: everything is fine at first (ensi Lagash-ak "the ruler of Lagash", dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son") but when you add a third link the affix tends to get forgotten: dam dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son's wife". Does Šɯk experience anything similar, or would it be incorrect to fail to stack -at three times in *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-at "the queen's healer's son's house"? What about if there's an intervening plural marker, such as *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-nye-at "the queen's healer's sons' house"? The same question I suppose applies to the other clitics; would one-man-and-his-dog-esque "A and B and C and …" constructions get weird if you have to string together lots of -bæ?
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:52 am
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
I don't know what zompist will answer but my guess is that the breakdown of purely correct grammar in such complex constructions is pretty natural and very likely to also occur in Šɯk. In most cases, when such things happen, the inaccuracy of the uttered (or written) grammar doesn't reflect a different system at work but more like a certain level of "slack" in the system. If you technically need three genitive markers in a row but only use two, it's unlikely that the lack of one marker is what gets you misunderstood in the broader context of the conversation.Ketsuban wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:48 am I know Sumerian has trouble keeping track of affixes when chaining possessives together: everything is fine at first (ensi Lagash-ak "the ruler of Lagash", dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son") but when you add a third link the affix tends to get forgotten: dam dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son's wife". Does Šɯk experience anything similar, or would it be incorrect to fail to stack -at three times in *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-at "the queen's healer's son's house"? What about if there's an intervening plural marker, such as *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-nye-at "the queen's healer's sons' house"? The same question I suppose applies to the other clitics; would one-man-and-his-dog-esque "A and B and C and …" constructions get weird if you have to string together lots of -bæ?
Duriac Thread | he/him
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
Incidentally, thanks for alerting me to the fact that Šɯk has been published! At a quick skim it reminds me fairly strongly of Khoekhoe, though the clicks are interestingly un-Earthlike — I’d quite like to know more about their phonetic realisation.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:52 am
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
I like to take any opportunity I see to plug Zompist's Patreon where you can learn about the modern (and future) world of Almea and see pre-release versions of grammars. It's been really fantastic and I'm personally very give a little bit back to Mark after so many years on his forum for free
Duriac Thread | he/him
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
Oh, I know about that already, but for various reasons it’s a bit tricky for me to subscribe to it at the moment, which is why I have to rely on what little is available publicly.vegfarandi wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:18 amI like to take any opportunity I see to plug Zompist's Patreon where you can learn about the modern (and future) world of Almea and see pre-release versions of grammars. It's been really fantastic and I'm personally very give a little bit back to Mark after so many years on his forum for free
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
Had to look up Jagersma on this... you and veg are right, Sumerian only stacks two ak in a row.
(Also, when I learned about this insane construction I just had to use it. There are more Sumerian borrowings in Šɯk as well, especially in the verbal section.)
I think this counts as a center embedding, so I would try not to push it further than that. This probably sounds to a Šɯk speaker like those grammatical-but-marginally-comprehensible English examples ("He said that that "that" that that "that" referred to was something else entirely").
(It's grammatically correct to say [A B-bæ] C-bæ. You could use that if it made semantic sense, kind of like "Batman and Superman, and also Joker.")
I've updated the grammar accordingly.
(Also, when I learned about this insane construction I just had to use it. There are more Sumerian borrowings in Šɯk as well, especially in the verbal section.)
You can't stack more than two at directly; this would be just nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at.Ketsuban wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:48 am I know Sumerian has trouble keeping track of affixes when chaining possessives together: everything is fine at first (ensi Lagash-ak "the ruler of Lagash", dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son") but when you add a third link the affix tends to get forgotten: dam dumu ensi Lagash-ak-ak "the ruler of Lagash's son's wife". Does Šɯk experience anything similar, or would it be incorrect to fail to stack -at three times in *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-at "the queen's healer's son's house"?
This however is fine.What about if there's an intervening plural marker, such as *nap meʇ ɯsak ʘily-at-at-nye-at "the queen's healer's sons' house"?
I think this counts as a center embedding, so I would try not to push it further than that. This probably sounds to a Šɯk speaker like those grammatical-but-marginally-comprehensible English examples ("He said that that "that" that that "that" referred to was something else entirely").
I'm going to say that -bæ can't be stacked at all, but doesn't need to be: you can say A B C-bæ.The same question I suppose applies to the other clitics; would one-man-and-his-dog-esque "A and B and C and …" constructions get weird if you have to string together lots of -bæ?
(It's grammatically correct to say [A B-bæ] C-bæ. You could use that if it made semantic sense, kind of like "Batman and Superman, and also Joker.")
I've updated the grammar accordingly.
- WarpedWartWars
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 2:31 pm
- Location: tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
I was struggling to find a grammatical sentence with three "that"s in a row, and you just gave one with six of them!
tɑ tɑ tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts olɑrk siθe
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death
tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death
tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
Heh! It's not mine-- I ran into (a version of) it long ago.WarpedWartWars wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 3:01 amI was struggling to find a grammatical sentence with three "that"s in a row, and you just gave one with six of them!
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
In the sections on topicalisation the gloss is off. with the that.one occuring after the warrior instead of before it. I thought it was a bit off until i reread it and realised the language gloss was correct.
- WeepingElf
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
What are those funny letters like ʇ or ʘ? Clicks?
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
My conlang pages
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
Fixed, thanks! (You may have to reload the page.)
- WarpedWartWars
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 2:31 pm
- Location: tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
Exactly--ʘ is labial, ʇ is dental.
Last edited by WarpedWartWars on Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tɑ tɑ tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts olɑrk siθe
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death
tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death
tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
There is a phonology section in the grammar...
- WarpedWartWars
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 2:31 pm
- Location: tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
I know, I was just going off my memory from reading it yesterday or maybe the day before.zompist wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:04 pmThere is a phonology section in the grammar...
tɑ tɑ tɑ tɑ θiθɾ eɾloθ tɑ moew θerts olɑrk siθe
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death
tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
of of of of death abyss of moew kingdom sand witch-PLURAL
The witches of the desert of the kingdom of Moew of the Abyss of Death
tɑ toɾose koɾot tsɑx
of apple-PLURAL magic cold
cold magic of apples
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1666
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: Šɯk grammar
I just want to say that I think Šɯk is really cool. I'm an especial fan of the clicks—I like seeing them in conlangs.
- WeepingElf
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: A Šɯk question from reading through the grammar
Sorry, then, for the dumb questionzompist wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:04 pmThere is a phonology section in the grammar...
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
My conlang pages
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1666
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: Šɯk grammar
I believe there’s a word missing from the sample here:
ɤʇlil, pægain ǁɤ nyany ifa men ʘily.
end-loc unite-3 Nyaʇa valley all-pl and be-3 queen
Finally Nyaʇa brought all the valleys together and became queen.
Re: Šɯk grammar
If there is, I can’t find it.Man in Space wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 1:21 pm I believe there’s a word missing from the sample here:
ɤʇlil, pægain ǁɤ nyany ifa men ʘily.
end-loc unite-3 Nyaʇa valley all-pl and be-3 queen
Finally Nyaʇa brought all the valleys together and became queen.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Re: Šɯk grammar
The name "ʇeʇ" on the map made me wonder if the page was rotated 180 degrees somehow. Then I wondered if it was "ʇəʇ" and Zomp was experimenting with an orthography which meant something completely different upside-down. Of course none of this is true, but it might start giving people ideas.
Self-referential signatures are for people too boring to come up with more interesting alternatives.