Page 35 of 37
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:23 pm
by Raphael
From technology-related group blog
Techdirt:
Don’t Fall For The Latest Changes To The Dangerous Kids Online Safety Act
(
https://www.techdirt.com/2024/02/20/don ... afety-act/ )
(That is, the bloggers claim that the proposed act in question is dangerous - it's
not an act about the online safety of dangerous kids.)
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:01 pm
by fusijui
I love that one, Raphael!
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:13 pm
by Raphael
fusijui wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:01 pm
I love that one, Raphael!
Thank you!
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:15 pm
by fusijui
Another one from the Grauniad: "Cat killer sentenced to life for Oxford murder as part of sexual fantasy".
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:31 am
by Raphael
fusijui wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:15 pm
Another one from the Grauniad:
"Cat killer sentenced to life for Oxford murder as part of sexual fantasy".
Having read the article, I now understand the headline, but it stills sounds weird to me that, when someone first killed a cat and then later a human being, the headline about them starts out by calling them a "cat killer".
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:16 am
by hwhatting
Raphael wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:31 am
Having read the article, I now understand the headline, but it stills sounds weird to me that, when someone first killed a cat and then later a human being, the headline about them starts out by calling them a "cat killer".
I have brought your wrong priorities to the attention of our feline overlords. They will pay you a visit.
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:34 pm
by fusijui
Raphael wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:31 am
fusijui wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:15 pm
Another one from the Grauniad:
"Cat killer sentenced to life for Oxford murder as part of sexual fantasy".
Having read the article, I now understand the headline, but it stills sounds weird to me that, when someone first killed a cat and then later a human being, the headline about them starts out by calling them a "cat killer".
That's why I like it so much, a rare double-barreled job: ambiguity over the species of the victim in the judgment, and whether the paraphilia was connected to the offense or the sentence.
(Or, for that matter, even the defendant's sexual fantasy or the judge's?)
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:52 pm
by fusijui
Another one from The Guardian: ‘No evil’ Putin will not commit to hold on to power, Zelenskiy says
I initially took 'No evil' as being in apposition to 'Putin' (like if someone said "'Don't Be Evil' Brin"), which then directed me down the path of interpreting the rest of the headline to mean something like "Putin, who is against evil, is not going to strive to stay in office, according to Zelenskiy".
Which I could immediately see was not a sentence The Guardian would print, even if Zelenskiy would actually say it. But it took me a good fifteen minutes, including walking away and coming back later, to be able to see the intended parsing.
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:46 pm
by bradrn
fusijui wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:52 pm
Another one from
The Guardian:
‘No evil’ Putin will not commit to hold on to power, Zelenskiy says
I initially took 'No evil' as being in apposition to 'Putin' (like if someone said "'Don't Be Evil' Brin"), which then directed me down the path of interpreting the rest of the headline to mean something like "Putin, who is against evil, is not going to strive to stay in office, according to Zelenskiy".
Which I could immediately see was not a sentence
The Guardian would print, even if Zelenskiy would actually say it. But it took me a good fifteen minutes, including walking away and coming back later, to be able to see the intended parsing.
I can’t see the intended parsing…
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:01 am
by fusijui
"Zelenskiy says that there is no evil which Putin will not commit, in order to stay in power."
I mean... I think that's it.
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:02 am
by bradrn
fusijui wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:01 am
"Zelenskiy says that there is no evil which Putin will not commit, in order to stay in power."
I mean... I
think that's it.
Ah-ha… that would make sense, thanks!
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:21 am
by fusijui
No, thank
you, for reassuring me that it's not some unique personal problem I had with it!
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 10:20 am
by hwhatting
fusijui wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:01 am
"Zelenskiy says that there is no evil which Putin will not commit, in order to stay in power."
Without you pointing it out, I also wouldn't have guessed that reading. It would have been much easier if they had left out the quotation marks, or put them around the entire clause before "says Z".
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 7:05 pm
by bradrn
hwhatting wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 10:20 am
fusijui wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:01 am
"Zelenskiy says that there is no evil which Putin will not commit, in order to stay in power."
Without you pointing it out, I also wouldn't have guessed that reading. It would have been much easier if they had left out the quotation marks, or put them around the entire clause before "says Z".
Really, all they needed to do is add ‘that’ just after ‘no evil’.
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:32 pm
by fusijui
I need to just read the Guardian regularly, it's a gold mine. Today I noticed:
Victoria police will still be involved in public drunkenness cases after decriminalisation, documents say
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 10:34 am
by hwhatting
fusijui wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:32 pm
Victoria police will still be involved in public drunkenness cases after decriminalisation, documents say
Cheers!
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 10:31 am
by Linguoboy
WaPo, opening with a classic garden path:
A new Scottish law that criminalizes the “stirring up of” hatred against some groups has triggered a debate far beyond its borders, pitting rights activists who say it’s needed to fight a rising tide of harassment and violence against conservative celebrities and politicians who say the law threatens free speech.
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 10:47 am
by bradrn
Linguoboy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 10:31 am
WaPo, opening with a classic garden path:
A new Scottish law that criminalizes the “stirring up of” hatred against some groups has triggered a debate far beyond its borders, pitting rights activists who say it’s needed to fight a rising tide of harassment and violence against conservative celebrities and politicians who say the law threatens free speech.
…this doesn’t seem at all confusing to me? Poorly edited, yes, but it makes sense to me.
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 7:55 am
by Man in Space
From a local X feed (19 Action News):
They're keeping smaller birds from pooping all over and making a mess of the city.
Initially I read this as
They're [keeping smaller birds from pooping all over] and [making a mess of the city].
and not
They're keeping smaller birds from [pooping all over and making a mess of the city].
Re: Confusing headlines
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 4:39 am
by bradrn
Officer accidentally fired gun while clearing Columbia building seizure — NYPD
Politics aside, suddenly running into that word ‘seizure’ at the end nearly gave me one… (no, it’s not that kind of seizure!)